Reviewers

Dear Reviewers,

A review needs to be of a very high quality and conform to a standardised format to maintain and improve the already exacting standards of KSSTA. We ask you to adhere to the stringent standards (set out below ) as it is the most useful feedback we can give to our authors. Therefore, we ask you to pay meticulous attention to every part of the manuscript.

Example of good KSSTA review

Confidential Comments to the Editor should include:

  • General comment about the manuscript
  • Originality of idea
  • Scientific content
  • Length of the manuscript
  • Recommendation as to whether it should be accepted, revised or rejected.

Comments to the Author should include:

General Comments
Abstract
Levels of evidence
Title
Introduction
Methods and materials
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Figures
Tables